![]() |
|||
| |||
| SUPER BOWL COMMERCIAL RECALL | |||
| Are Super Bowl ads a fleeting waste of money or a fantastic investment for a brand? | When Viewers Only Average Nine Percent Recall A Week After The Game,
Is $2.6MM For 30 Seconds Really Worth It?
Every year companies pay millions of dollars for 30 or 60 seconds of airtime during the Super Bowl, with the heaviest advertisers purchasing multiple commercial spots. Many viewers look forward to these commercials as much as the game itself. Are the commercials themselves becoming more famous than their sponsors? One might be led to believe that most people watching the Super Bowl generally do not remember the ads, and even if they do, will have difficulty matching these commercials to the brands they represent. Are Super Bowl ads a fleeting waste of money or a fantastic investment for a brand? This topic represents a wildly polarizing discussion between the consumers that watch the commercials and the professionals that create them. |
||
| HISTORICAL SUPER BOWL ADVERTISING COST | |||
| As the total amount of viewers of the Super Bowl has reached the hundreds of millions in the United States, and over a billion worldwide, the expense of reaching those captive eyeballs has increased dramatically. The cost to advertise during the game is four times expensive as it was 20 years ago – with yearly increases of 7%. The network televising the game receives an incredible total revenue windfall of over $160 million. For companies, to reach all those viewers is incredibly alluring; is it worth it? | |||
![]() |
|||
| THE MARKITECTURE SURVEY METHODOLOGY | |||
| Most traditional Super Bowl commercial reviews stress the immediate impact of the ad - how much it
was liked, how clever/unique it was, etc. Most notably, USA Today has a running “Ad Meter” during
the game that measures immediate consumer response. Markitecture took a different tack to this issue,
feeling it is not the immediate impression, but instead the lasting impact of an ad that truly proves its
effectiveness. While some ads are deemed “classics”, do most of them really stand the test of time?
One week after the Super Bowl, Markitecture conducted an online survey of a national sample of
1,500 people who watched the entire game; the sample was provided by e-Rewards Market Research.
Respondents were given an initial list of brands/companies that advertised during the game – along with several others that did not advertise. They were asked to select which brands, if any, they recalled advertising the game. As a follow-up, they were given a list of commercial descriptions – without brands – that aired and were asked which of the ads they recalled seeing during the game. Finally, for any ads they recalled seeing, they were asked which brand or company sponsored the ad. Respondents were given a list of brands similar to the actual advertising brand, along with the correct brand itself, and some additional other brands that did not actually advertise during the game. The entire survey took less than 5 minutes. | |||
| SURVEY FINDINGS | |||
| With viewers glued to their TV sets, you would think that they would likely remember some of the major brands and companies that advertised, especially those with multiple commercials and others that like to make a big splash every year with their Super Bowl advertising – right? Amazingly, no single brand was recalled by at least half of Super Bowl viewers. Budweiser and Bud Light led the way at 46% and 39% brand recall respectively, but the average brand was only recalled by 12% of respondents. On the flip side, some brands that did not advertise were included in order to test the “ghost awareness” that respondents may accidentally generate – the equivalent of a false positive reading. Neither Pepsi nor Miller Lite advertised during this year's game, but that didn't stop 12% and 10%, respectively, of viewers who thought they did actually run ads. And half the brands that advertised only received a 6% or less recall. | |||
![]() |
|||
Note: shaded brands advertised during the game; non-shaded brands did not. |
|||
The full Paper is available in PDF format No part of these materials may be reproduced in any form without written permission.
About Markitecture Markitecture: A BrandNew™ approach to marketing consulting. Delivering organic growth through Insight, Innovation, and Implementation. What makes Markitecture different from generalist ad agencies, research firms, and brand consultants? Developing successful new products requires an interdisciplinary approach. Markitecture's fully integrated team of professionals shares the responsibility for the vision, design, conceptualization, and construction of brand and marketing strategies, becoming in effect, your new product architect, all under one roof. Our team includes research, brand marketing, media, design, and creative disciplines. Our expertise spans business-to-consumer and business-to-business, direct marketed as well as traditionally marketed. At Markitecture, we create breakthrough strategies based on Best Practices Principles developed over 30 years of new product work. We're both right brain and left brain thinkers and doers … working on your new product development and introduction with a “360 degree” approach. No hand-offs to “partners” or “departments” or “affiliates.” We are involved in your business from Inception to In Market™. For further information, visit www.markitecture.com |
|||
| About e-Rewards Market Research e-Rewards Market Research, the online sample quality leader, provides the highest level of service through its 2,000,000+ member Consumer Panel and 1,000,000+ member Business Panel, while maintaining over 300 profiling segments. Response rates are among the highest in the industry, 15-35%. “By invitation only” enrollment methodology reduces self-selection bias and blocks “professional survey takers.” |
|||
|
|||